← All Comparisons

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.80$2.00+150%
Output / 1M tokens$4.00$16.00+300%
Context window200K200K
Max output8.192K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3 Codex
MMLU-Pro69.4%90%
HumanEval88.1%96.5%
GPQA78%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons