← All Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5

A detailed comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-5 (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$1.25-75%
Output / 1M tokens$25.00$10.00-60%
Context window200K128K
Max output32K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5
MMLU-Pro89.5%88.5%
HumanEval95%95%
GPQA75.5%73.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

GPT-5 Strengths

  • Strong all-around performance
  • Good price for flagship tier
  • Multimodal including audio

GPT-5 Weaknesses

  • 128K context vs 200K+ for newer models
  • Codex variants better for pure coding

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-5 is the more affordable option at $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Opus 4.6 supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-5 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons