← All Comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3
A detailed comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Mistral Medium 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.40 | -87% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $2.00 | -87% |
| Context window | 200K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86% | 76% |
| HumanEval | 94% | 87% |
| GPQA | 70% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Opus 4.5 quality at 1/5th the cost
- ✓Best value for production workloads
- ✓1M context in beta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Long context pricing doubles above 200K
- ✗Slightly below Opus 4.6 on hardest tasks
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
Quick Verdict
Best value: Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.3% avg).
Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens.
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.