← All Comparisons

DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3DeepSeek R1Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.14$0.55+293%
Output / 1M tokens$0.28$2.19+682%
Context window164K128K
Max output16.384K64K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3DeepSeek R1
MMLU-Pro78%84%
HumanEval89%92%
GPQA71.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3DeepSeek R1
code
reasoning
text

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

DeepSeek R1 Strengths

  • Cheapest reasoning model available
  • Strong math and science performance
  • Open-source with off-peak discounts

DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses

  • Slower than non-reasoning models
  • No vision or tool-use
  • China-based — availability concerns

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek V3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.5% avg).

Larger context: DeepSeek V3 supports 164K tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose DeepSeek R1 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons