← All Comparisons

DeepSeek V3 vs Mistral Medium 3

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3Mistral Medium 3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.14$0.40+186%
Output / 1M tokens$0.28$2.00+614%
Context window164K128K
Max output16.384K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Mistral Medium 3
MMLU-Pro78%76%
HumanEval89%87%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3Mistral Medium 3
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

Mistral Medium 3 Strengths

  • Very affordable for mid-tier quality
  • Good multilingual performance

Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses

  • Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
  • Smaller community and tooling

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek V3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.5% avg).

Larger context: DeepSeek V3 supports 164K tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons