← All Comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 3
A detailed comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $2.00 | +1233% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $5.00 | +733% |
| Context window | 1M | 128K | — |
| Max output | 65.536K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 83% |
| HumanEval | 89.5% | 91% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths
- ✓One of the cheapest models available
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Free tier available
Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
- ✗Output quality inconsistent on edge cases
Mistral Large 3 Strengths
- ✓Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
- ✓Strong multilingual support
- ✓European data sovereignty option
Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
- ✗Smaller ecosystem
Quick Verdict
Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).
Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Large 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.