← All Comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V3

A detailed comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProDeepSeek V3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$1.25$0.14-89%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$0.28-97%
Context window1M164K
Max output65.536K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProDeepSeek V3
MMLU-Pro87.5%78%
HumanEval93.5%89%
GPQA76%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 2.5 ProDeepSeek V3
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 2.5 Pro Strengths

  • Competitive pricing for its capabilities
  • 1M context window
  • Well-tested and stable

Gemini 2.5 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by Gemini 3 Pro

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons