← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs DeepSeek R1

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 FlashDeepSeek R1Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.50$0.55+10%
Output / 1M tokens$3.00$2.19-27%
Context window1M128K
Max output65.536K64K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashDeepSeek R1
MMLU-Pro78%84%
HumanEval90%92%
GPQA71.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 FlashDeepSeek R1
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Very fast
  • Free tier available via Google AI Studio

Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses

  • Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
  • Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)

DeepSeek R1 Strengths

  • Cheapest reasoning model available
  • Strong math and science performance
  • Open-source with off-peak discounts

DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses

  • Slower than non-reasoning models
  • No vision or tool-use
  • China-based — availability concerns

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.0% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Flash if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons