← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 FlashGLM-5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.50$1.00+100%
Output / 1M tokens$3.00$3.20+7%
Context window1M200K
Max output65.536K128K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashGLM-5
MMLU-Pro78%70.4%
HumanEval90%91%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 FlashGLM-5
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Very fast
  • Free tier available via Google AI Studio

Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses

  • Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
  • Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)

GLM-5 Strengths

  • Open-weight (MIT license) — self-hostable
  • 77.8% SWE-Bench Verified — top-tier coding
  • 128K max output — huge generation window

GLM-5 Weaknesses

  • MMLU-Pro lags behind Western flagships
  • 744B parameters — heavy to self-host
  • China-based — availability concerns

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 3 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.5/$3 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.0% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if cost matters most. Choose GLM-5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons