← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs DeepSeek R1
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | DeepSeek R1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.55 | +267% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $2.19 | +265% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 64K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 84% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 92% |
| GPQA | — | 71.5% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✗ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek R1 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (82.5% avg).
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose DeepSeek R1 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.