← All Comparisons

GPT-4o Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4o MiniGemini 2.5 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.15$1.25+733%
Output / 1M tokens$0.60$10.00+1567%
Context window128K1M
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4o MiniGemini 2.5 Pro
MMLU-Pro68%87.5%
HumanEval87.2%93.5%
GPQA76%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4o MiniGemini 2.5 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

Gemini 2.5 Pro Strengths

  • Competitive pricing for its capabilities
  • 1M context window
  • Well-tested and stable

Gemini 2.5 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by Gemini 3 Pro

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons