← All Comparisons

GPT-4o Mini vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4o MiniGemini 3.1 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.15$2.00+1233%
Output / 1M tokens$0.60$12.00+1900%
Context window128K1M
Max output16.384K64K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4o MiniGemini 3.1 Pro
MMLU-Pro68%91%
HumanEval87.2%95%
GPQA94.3%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4o MiniGemini 3.1 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • #1 on 12 of 18 tracked benchmarks
  • 94.3% GPQA Diamond — highest of any model
  • Same price as Gemini 3 Pro (free upgrade)
  • 1M context with configurable thinking levels

Gemini 3.1 Pro Weaknesses

  • Still in preview
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (93.4% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons