← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs Mistral Large 3
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $2.00 | +1233% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $5.00 | +733% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 83% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 91% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Mistral Large 3 Strengths
- ✓Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
- ✓Strong multilingual support
- ✓European data sovereignty option
Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
- ✗Smaller ecosystem
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Large 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.