← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs Mistral Medium 3
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Medium 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.40 | +167% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $2.00 | +233% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 76% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 87% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.5% avg).
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.