← All Comparisons

GPT-4o vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4oGemini 3.1 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$2.50$2.00-20%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$12.00+20%
Context window128K1M
Max output16.384K64K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4oGemini 3.1 Pro
MMLU-Pro80.5%91%
HumanEval91%95%
GPQA64.2%94.3%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4oGemini 3.1 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Strengths

  • Well-established and reliable
  • Large ecosystem of tools and integrations

GPT-4o Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by GPT-5 series
  • Higher price than newer, better alternatives

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • #1 on 12 of 18 tracked benchmarks
  • 94.3% GPQA Diamond — highest of any model
  • Same price as Gemini 3 Pro (free upgrade)
  • 1M context with configurable thinking levels

Gemini 3.1 Pro Weaknesses

  • Still in preview
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o is the more affordable option at $2.5/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (93.4% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-4o if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons