← All Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.18 | -93% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $0.63 | -94% |
| Context window | 128K | 10M | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 74.2% |
| HumanEval | 91% | 86% |
| GPQA | 64.2% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| audio | ✓ | ✗ |
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Strengths
- ✓Well-established and reliable
- ✓Large ecosystem of tools and integrations
GPT-4o Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by GPT-5 series
- ✗Higher price than newer, better alternatives
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.18/$0.63 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Scout scores higher on average across available benchmarks (80.1% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.