← All Comparisons

GPT-4o vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4oMiniMax M2.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.50$0.30-88%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$1.20-88%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K128K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4oMiniMax M2.5
MMLU-Pro80.5%82%
HumanEval91%90%
GPQA64.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4oMiniMax M2.5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Strengths

  • Well-established and reliable
  • Large ecosystem of tools and integrations

GPT-4o Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by GPT-5 series
  • Higher price than newer, better alternatives

MiniMax M2.5 Strengths

  • Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
  • 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
  • Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run

MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses

  • Text-only — no vision or audio
  • No tool-use support
  • Newer provider — smaller ecosystem

Quick Verdict

Best value: MiniMax M2.5 is the more affordable option at $0.3/$1.2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.0% avg).

Larger context: MiniMax M2.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose MiniMax M2.5 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons