← All Comparisons
GPT-4o vs o4-mini
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and o4-mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o | o4-mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $1.10 | -56% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $4.40 | -56% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 100K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 85% |
| HumanEval | 91% | 93.5% |
| GPQA | 64.2% | 76% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| audio | ✓ | ✗ |
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Strengths
- ✓Well-established and reliable
- ✓Large ecosystem of tools and integrations
GPT-4o Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by GPT-5 series
- ✗Higher price than newer, better alternatives
o4-mini Strengths
- ✓Affordable reasoning model
- ✓200K context window
- ✓Good for math and science
o4-mini Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗Reasoning tokens add to effective cost
Quick Verdict
Best value: o4-mini is the more affordable option at $1.1/$4.4 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: o4-mini scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.8% avg).
Larger context: o4-mini supports 200K tokens.
Choose o4-mini if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.