← All Comparisons
GPT-5 vs Llama 4 Scout
A detailed comparison of GPT-5 (OpenAI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-5 | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $0.18 | -86% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $0.63 | -94% |
| Context window | 128K | 10M | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 88.5% | 74.2% |
| HumanEval | 95% | 86% |
| GPQA | 73.5% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| audio | ✓ | ✗ |
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-5 Strengths
- ✓Strong all-around performance
- ✓Good price for flagship tier
- ✓Multimodal including audio
GPT-5 Weaknesses
- ✗128K context vs 200K+ for newer models
- ✗Codex variants better for pure coding
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.18/$0.63 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GPT-5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.