← All Comparisons

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Gemini 3 Pro

A detailed comparison of GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) and Gemini 3 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 CodexGemini 3 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$1.75$2.00+14%
Output / 1M tokens$14.00$12.00-14%
Context window200K1M
Max output65.536K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexGemini 3 Pro
MMLU-Pro89%89.8%
HumanEval95.5%94%
GPQA76%77%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-5.2 CodexGemini 3 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths

  • Strong coding performance
  • Available via API now
  • 200K context window

GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 5.3
  • Higher output cost than some competitors

Gemini 3 Pro Strengths

  • Stable and well-tested
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong multimodal with audio

Gemini 3 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 3.1 Pro
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 3 Pro is the more affordable option at $2/$12 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons