← All Comparisons

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3

A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickMistral Medium 3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.31$0.40+29%
Output / 1M tokens$0.85$2.00+135%
Context window1M128K
Max output32K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMistral Medium 3
MMLU-Pro80.5%76%
HumanEval90.2%87%

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama 4 MaverickMistral Medium 3
code
text
tool-use
vision

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • 1M context window
  • Very competitive via API providers

Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses

  • Requires significant compute to self-host
  • Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models

Mistral Medium 3 Strengths

  • Very affordable for mid-tier quality
  • Good multilingual performance

Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses

  • Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
  • Smaller community and tooling

Quick Verdict

Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).

Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons