← All Comparisons

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

A detailed comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.1 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.80$2.00+150%
Output / 1M tokens$4.00$12.00+200%
Context window200K1M
Max output8.192K64K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
MMLU-Pro69.4%91%
HumanEval88.1%95%
GPQA94.3%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • #1 on 12 of 18 tracked benchmarks
  • 94.3% GPQA Diamond — highest of any model
  • Same price as Gemini 3 Pro (free upgrade)
  • 1M context with configurable thinking levels

Gemini 3.1 Pro Weaknesses

  • Still in preview
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (93.4% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons