← All Comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick
A detailed comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.80 | $0.31 | -61% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.00 | $0.85 | -79% |
| Context window | 200K | 1M | — |
| Max output | 8.192K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 69.4% | 80.5% |
| HumanEval | 88.1% | 90.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths
- ✓Very fast responses
- ✓Cheapest Anthropic option
- ✓Good for classification and extraction
Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
- ✗Can struggle with nuanced instructions
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.