← All Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.6Grok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$3.00-40%
Output / 1M tokens$25.00$15.00-40%
Context window200K128K
Max output32K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Grok 4
MMLU-Pro89.5%86%
HumanEval95%93%
GPQA75.5%72%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.6Grok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Grok 4 is the more affordable option at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Opus 4.6 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Grok 4 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons