← All Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.5
A detailed comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.30 | -94% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $1.20 | -95% |
| Context window | 200K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 128K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 89.5% | 82% |
| HumanEval | 95% | 90% |
| GPQA | 75.5% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✗ |
Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
- ✓1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
- ✓Strong at following complex multi-step instructions
Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
- ✗1M context beta is Tier 4 only
MiniMax M2.5 Strengths
- ✓Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
- ✓80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
- ✓Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run
MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Text-only — no vision or audio
- ✗No tool-use support
- ✗Newer provider — smaller ecosystem
Quick Verdict
Best value: MiniMax M2.5 is the more affordable option at $0.3/$1.2 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).
Choose MiniMax M2.5 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.