← All Comparisons
Meta vs MiniMax
A comprehensive comparison of Meta (2 models) and MiniMax (1 model) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
codetextvision
MiniMax
Models
1
Price range
$1.50 – $1.50
Avg benchmarks
86.0%
Avg context
200K
codereasoningtext
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
| MiniMax M2.5 | MiniMax | Open Source | $0.30 | $1.20 | 200K | 86.0% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Open Source
Llama 4 MaverickMeta
Input
$0.31/1M
Output
$0.85/1M
Context
1M
Avg Bench
85.3%
Input
$0.30/1M
Output
$1.20/1M
Context
200K
Avg Bench
86.0%
Verdict
Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $1.50/1M from MiniMax.
Higher benchmarks: MiniMax averages 86.0% across models, vs 82.7% from Meta.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Meta offers 2 models vs 1 from MiniMax.
Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose MiniMax if you need the highest quality across your workloads.
Model-Level Comparisons
Other Provider Comparisons
Anthropic vs DeepSeekAnthropic vs GoogleAnthropic vs MetaAnthropic vs MiniMaxAnthropic vs MistralAnthropic vs OpenAIAnthropic vs xAIAnthropic vs Zhipu AIDeepSeek vs GoogleDeepSeek vs MetaDeepSeek vs MiniMaxDeepSeek vs MistralDeepSeek vs OpenAIDeepSeek vs xAIDeepSeek vs Zhipu AIGoogle vs MetaGoogle vs MiniMaxGoogle vs MistralGoogle vs OpenAIGoogle vs xAIGoogle vs Zhipu AIMeta vs MistralMeta vs OpenAIMeta vs xAIMeta vs Zhipu AIMiniMax vs MistralMiniMax vs OpenAIMiniMax vs xAIMiniMax vs Zhipu AIMistral vs OpenAIMistral vs xAIMistral vs Zhipu AIOpenAI vs xAIOpenAI vs Zhipu AIxAI vs Zhipu AI