← All Comparisons

Meta vs MiniMax

A comprehensive comparison of Meta (2 models) and MiniMax (1 model) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.

Provider Overview

Meta

Models

2

Price range

$0.81 – $1.16

Avg benchmarks

82.7%

Avg context

5.5M

codetextvision

MiniMax

Models

1

Price range

$1.50 – $1.50

Avg benchmarks

86.0%

Avg context

200K

codereasoningtext

Model Lineup Comparison

ModelProviderCategoryInput $/1MOutput $/1MContextAvg Bench
Llama 4 ScoutMetaOpen Source$0.18$0.6310M80.1%
Llama 4 MaverickMetaOpen Source$0.31$0.851M85.3%
MiniMax M2.5MiniMaxOpen Source$0.30$1.20200K86.0%

Head-to-Head by Category

Open Source

Input

$0.31/1M

Output

$0.85/1M

Context

1M

Avg Bench

85.3%

MiniMax M2.5MiniMaxWinner
Input

$0.30/1M

Output

$1.20/1M

Context

200K

Avg Bench

86.0%

Verdict

Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $1.50/1M from MiniMax.

Higher benchmarks: MiniMax averages 86.0% across models, vs 82.7% from Meta.

Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.

More models: Meta offers 2 models vs 1 from MiniMax.

Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose MiniMax if you need the highest quality across your workloads.

Model-Level Comparisons

Other Provider Comparisons