← All Comparisons
Meta vs xAI
A comprehensive comparison of Meta (2 models) and xAI (1 model) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
codetextvision
xAI
Models
1
Price range
$18.00 – $18.00
Avg benchmarks
83.7%
Avg context
128K
codereasoningtexttool-usevisionweb-search
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4 | xAI | Flagship | $3.00 | $15.00 | 128K | 83.7% |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Flagship
No flagship model from Meta
Input
$3.00/1M
Output
$15.00/1M
Context
128K
Avg Bench
83.7%
Open Source
Input
$0.31/1M
Output
$0.85/1M
Context
1M
Avg Bench
85.3%
No open source model from xAI
Verdict
Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $18.00/1M from xAI.
Higher benchmarks: xAI averages 83.7% across models, vs 82.7% from Meta.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Meta offers 2 models vs 1 from xAI.
Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose xAI if you need the highest quality across your workloads.
Model-Level Comparisons
Other Provider Comparisons
Anthropic vs DeepSeekAnthropic vs GoogleAnthropic vs MetaAnthropic vs MiniMaxAnthropic vs MistralAnthropic vs OpenAIAnthropic vs xAIAnthropic vs Zhipu AIDeepSeek vs GoogleDeepSeek vs MetaDeepSeek vs MiniMaxDeepSeek vs MistralDeepSeek vs OpenAIDeepSeek vs xAIDeepSeek vs Zhipu AIGoogle vs MetaGoogle vs MiniMaxGoogle vs MistralGoogle vs OpenAIGoogle vs xAIGoogle vs Zhipu AIMeta vs MiniMaxMeta vs MistralMeta vs OpenAIMeta vs Zhipu AIMiniMax vs MistralMiniMax vs OpenAIMiniMax vs xAIMiniMax vs Zhipu AIMistral vs OpenAIMistral vs xAIMistral vs Zhipu AIOpenAI vs xAIOpenAI vs Zhipu AIxAI vs Zhipu AI