Anthropic vs Meta
A comprehensive comparison of Anthropic (4 models) and Meta (2 models) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
Anthropic
Models
4
Price range
$4.80 – $30.00
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
200K
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K | 86.7% |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | Mid-Tier | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | 83.3% |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | Mid-Tier | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | 81.9% |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Anthropic | Budget | $0.80 | $4.00 | 200K | 78.8% |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Flagship
$5.00/1M
$25.00/1M
200K
86.7%
Mid-Tier
$3.00/1M
$15.00/1M
200K
83.3%
Budget
$0.80/1M
$4.00/1M
200K
78.8%
Open Source
$0.31/1M
$0.85/1M
1M
85.3%
Verdict
Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $4.80/1M from Anthropic.
Higher benchmarks: Meta averages 82.7% across models, vs 82.7% from Anthropic.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Anthropic offers 4 models vs 2 from Meta.
Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose Meta if you need the highest quality across your workloads.