Meta vs Mistral
A comprehensive comparison of Meta (2 models) and Mistral (2 models) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
Mistral
Models
2
Price range
$2.40 – $7.00
Avg benchmarks
84.3%
Avg context
128K
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Large 3 | Mistral | Flagship | $2.00 | $5.00 | 128K | 87.0% |
| Mistral Medium 3 | Mistral | Mid-Tier | $0.40 | $2.00 | 128K | 81.5% |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Flagship
$2.00/1M
$5.00/1M
128K
87.0%
Mid-Tier
$0.40/1M
$2.00/1M
128K
81.5%
Open Source
$0.31/1M
$0.85/1M
1M
85.3%
Verdict
Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $2.40/1M from Mistral.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral averages 84.3% across models, vs 82.7% from Meta.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Mistral offers 2 models vs 2 from Meta.
Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose Mistral if you need the highest quality across your workloads.