Meta vs Zhipu AI
A comprehensive comparison of Meta (2 models) and Zhipu AI (2 models) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
Zhipu AI
Models
2
Price range
$2.80 – $4.20
Avg benchmarks
81.4%
Avg context
200K
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5 | Zhipu AI | Flagship | $1.00 | $3.20 | 200K | 77.8% |
| GLM-4.7 | Zhipu AI | Mid-Tier | $0.60 | $2.20 | 200K | 85.0% |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Flagship
$1.00/1M
$3.20/1M
200K
77.8%
Mid-Tier
$0.60/1M
$2.20/1M
200K
85.0%
Open Source
$0.31/1M
$0.85/1M
1M
85.3%
Verdict
Best on price: Meta offers the cheapest option at $0.81/1M tokens combined, vs $2.80/1M from Zhipu AI.
Higher benchmarks: Meta averages 82.7% across models, vs 81.4% from Zhipu AI.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Zhipu AI offers 2 models vs 2 from Meta.
Choose Meta if cost is your priority. Choose Meta if you need the highest quality across your workloads.